Wednesday, 27 June 2018

The Business of Government


What could be more logical?  Surely it makes a lot of sense for political leaders to have been business leaders.  After all they are used to running large companies with many layers management and workers.  Don’t they make important business decisions every day?  The recent elections of Donald Trump and Doug Ford certainly shows that people think business leaders will make the best political leaders and are willing to bet the future fortunes of their countries or provinces on that fact.
 
Well maybe it’s not that good an idea after all.

Business executives love power.  They are in business to make money, to make a product or supply a service for profit, and most of all to make sure their company’s shares continue to rise.  They answer only to a Board of Directors who are all like minded individuals.  Their workers and customers are only there to contribute to profit and rising share prices.  They are used to power to make unilateral decisions with little or preferably no opposition.  They are, in their own way, dictators. When they enter politics as leaders (for many would not enter under any other circumstance), they expect to be treated the same way; unopposed, dictatorial and rewarded (I bring to your attention the cover of Time Magazine for the week or 20 June 2018). To them, the role of business is business.

“Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship.”


However, as any good politician will tell you, the role of government is people.  People are citizens, tax payers, voters for whom the politician serves.  To a good politician, people are people: to a business leader people are resources (it is a lot easier to discard resources than fire people).  Politicians answer to no Board of Directors but to voters who can remove the politician at the next election, or in some cases before.  There is no question that there have been, and continues to be, bad politicians.  But if the electorate do their job, bad politicians don’t last long.  There should be no such thing as a ‘safe’ seat.  

Which brings me to the next part.  There is an important role for voters in a democracy.  It is to decide who represent them and who is the leader that leads them.  Voters who do not understand this are not doing their part.  We get no say about who runs big or small corporations.  Not unless we are significant stock holders and of course, very few of us are.  But we do get a say about who leads us.  In most cases, businessmen and women don’t understand that.  They think that their power in the boardroom will translate into power in a government.  They forget that their power comes from the people, not from their cronies in the boardroom.

“In democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism it's your count that votes.”

To the best of my knowledge and the reading of history, there has never been a successful political leader who has come straight from business.  Those that have been successful have worked their way up the political ladder before become leader and who have proven their worth as a politician.

“The Constitution gives every American the inalienable right to make a damn fool of himself.”

Monday, 4 June 2018

Some Political Thoughts


Trump’s Tariff Tiff

“At least two-thirds of our miseries spring from human stupidity, human malice and those great motivators and justifiers of malice and stupidity: idealism, dogmatism and proselytizing zeal on behalf of religious or political ideas.”
  - Aldous Huxley

The imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum by the United States last week under the guise of national security was, to put it mildly, an insult to Canada and the European Union.  America will gladly sell any of these countries any amount of military hardware, but it cannot apparently contain any steel or aluminum from any of these other countries. It is a stupid move, but it appears that, as it applies to Canada (and Mexico), it is a blackmail tactic to force Canada and Mexico to cave in on US NAFTA demands.  This became blatantly obvious when PM Trudeau recounted the conversation with the US Vice President wherein Trudeau was ‘uninvited’ to visit the US President to discuss these issues unless he supported one of the US’s key demands.

I was very proud of our Prime Minister when he announced the retaliatory measures that Canada was prepared to take.  He not only spoke forcefully about Canada’s partnerships with the US but was temperate enough to offer the US one month to rethink their stance.  He was strongly supported in this news conference by our Minister of Global Affairs.  Some said that, as a result, we started a ‘trade war’, but any trade war was started by the United States, not us.

Of course, there was the usual outcry from opposition politicians and pundits.  In some cases, the outcry seemed to follow the adage “rape is inevitable so lie back and enjoy it” (this is a turn of phrase and should not be construed as a slight against rape victims).  As with many of the complaints of pundits these days and on many subjects, they offer many objections to ideas or actions, but no answers to what should be done.  One opposition leader advocated that the issue should be settled by negotiation.  But as was seen by the reaction by the US Vice President, there is no desire on the US’s part to negotiate this issue.  If your negotiating opponent’s idea is a “I win, you all lose” attitude then you must get his attention and make it clear that you cannot and will not accept such a condition.

I think the measures being proposed by Canada and the EU are the right ones and are proportional to what is being done by the US.  

Ontario Election Blues

“Man is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones.”
  - Bertrand Russell

This Thursday is election day in Ontario and I am confused.  It seemed obvious that for most people in the province it was a case of anybody but the Liberals.  The choice at first seemed like a slam dunk for the Conservatives.  They had an overwhelming lead.  And then their leader, the unpredictable Doug Ford, started to open his mouth and over the last few weeks, that lead has all but evaporated.  Is this the kind of ‘snatching defeat from the jaws of victory’ Premier that we need in Ontario?  He is now 1% behind the New Democratic Party.  But in the magic that is election tallying, he is still expected to win a majority based solely on his strength in Toronto.  If he wins, he will become the Premier of Toronto because he has no incentive to care about any of the rest of the province.  I don’t think that Doug Ford is another Donald Trump.  I don’t think he’s near as intelligent as even the US President.

“Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship.”

I am usually a Liberal (or at least a liberal).  But they have done themselves in by poor strategy.  They have spent so much of their political capital trying to shove the NDP into the ocean that they have abandoned those of us who reside in the middle of the road that we have nowhere to go.  There is now a huge gap in the middle of the Ontario political spectrum.  Nobody apparently wants to fill it.

The only leader that has shown a consistent message and has advocated well, as has been shown by the constant rise in her party’s fortunes, has been Andrea Horwath of the NDP.  At best she could possibly win a minority but that would be good enough for her to hold power with support from the Liberals.  If the PCs won a minority, it is very unlikely that any other party would support them unless they compromised way beyond the approval of their right-wing supporters.  The PCs have been sending messages to scare us from voting for the NDP.  They hark back to the government of Bob Raye, but that was over twenty years ago, and certainly the PCs have had their share of failures since then.  They have picked on individual NDP candidates for views that they think are heretical, particularly a couple who have, in the past, stated opinions against veterans and the armed forces.  There has always been a peace faction in the NDP and there probably always will be.  But since defence and veterans’ affairs are not under provincial jurisdiction, why should this matter?

So perhaps you can see my confusion and frustration with this election.  

“The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth.”
  - Edith Sitwell